Years ago I
worked in the apartment management industry.
During that time I had the fortune to work on a few ‘tax credit
properties’ and I witnessed first-hand how easily the system can be
cheated. I have spoken out against the
inefficiency of programs run by the government many times since but yesterday a
picture floating around the internet brought all back to me. I’m going to tell you the story of two women
who lived at one property and how their entitlement mentality is part of the
problem in America today.
Before I do, I
want to clarify that I do not think all government assistance programs are
bad. I just think they are poorly
managed. For example, the ‘tax credit’
program for apartment community owners is not a bad program. It allows people who are starting over in
life, for whatever reason, to be able to afford a nice place to live without
having their entire paycheck go toward rent.
It works by giving these owners a tax break for keeping rents at about
half the median of market rents. There
are very stringent rules that each applicant must abide by and that each
apartment community manager must enforce.
The problem is, the government dictates the rules and manages the
program. Therefore, it is a program that
is easily taken advantage of and abused.
Our first woman
had five children and each had a different father. She was on food stamps, received Medicaid for
all of her children, collected child support through the state, was on Section
8 housing and refused to get a job outside the home. Oh…and all five of her children went to
daycare through a program paid for by the state. Her entire rent was covered by the Section 8
program. Her food was paid for by food
stamps. Her children attended daycare
paid for by the state and all their medical needs were taken care of by
Medicaid. The only thing not covered by
our government in one way or another was her utilities. Yet every month the child support money
disappeared and she was at the local TANF office applying for help to cover her
utilities. She never worked, her
children were not at home for a good part of the day and everything was paid
for. Hmmmm….why couldn’t she pay her
utilities herself? Then it came time
for inspection of the units. Inside her
unit I found large flat screen TV’s in the living room and all three bedrooms,
furniture from Ethan Allen, a Cadillac Escalade in her parking space and a
cabinet full of a wide variety of alcohol.
But because the government never
came to check in on her, none of that was ever caught and her abuse of the
system continued.

The second woman
had two daughters and a job. She paid
her own rent, paid for her own food and utilities, and even had a nice vehicle
to drive. She wasn’t breaking any rules
or taking advantage of the system. She
believed in personal responsibility and paying your own way. At least she felt that way until her 16 year
old daughter came up pregnant and didn’t know who the daddy was. At the moment woman #2 figured out that it was
the government school and the local health department who were responsible for
her daughter getting pregnant since they wouldn’t give her free birth
control. It never dawned on woman #2
that the example she had set for her two daughters herself might be part of the
problem. You see, she felt that an enlightened
and empowered woman of the 90’s should be able to have as many sex partners as
she wanted without having to consider the consequences of her actions. Woman #2 thought it was the responsibility of
the school and local health department to keep her daughter from getting
pregnant at the young age of 16 so that she could be free to engage in ‘extra-curricular
bedroom activities’. Thanks to the whole
meme of ‘it takes a village to raise a child’, she felt that others should be responsible
for teaching her daughters morals and that she did not have to set a good
example herself. Now we have another
unwed teenager in need of government assistance because woman #2 has decided it
is not her responsibility to help raise the child since it was the state’s
fault her daughter got pregnant in the first place.
Both of these
women were and are still burdens on society. Their choices had and still have a direct
impact on the pocketbooks of taxpayers everywhere. The fact that no government employee ever
came to verify the ‘neediness’ of woman #1 is direct proof of the inefficiency
of our government to manage anything.
The fact that woman #2 felt that the state should be in charge of
teaching values and morals instead of herself, is direct proof that the village
raising your child is a sure way to make yourself a grandparent at a much
younger age. Our system is overburdened
with abuse from the citizenry and neglect from the very people put in charge to
manage assistance programs. And the
truth is, our government wants to keep it this way because it increases the
voting block that keeps them in office.
It is time that
we take back the country and insist that these attitudes are no longer
acceptable. We must make it clear that
we are not here to support or take care of these women and their children who
continue to take advantage and/or abuse the system. We must demand that they take personal
responsibility and deny their requests for assistance in any way shape or form. Call me a cold hearted ‘female dog’ if you
want, but I’d rather see them on the street than allow them to continue their
rape of our pocket books. Obama’s ‘Julia’
will only encourage the behavior discussed above and we must stop it. We MUST make a change in November! The only sure way to secure a woman's independence is to STOP insisting she look to the government for help and that she take personal responsibility for her actions. The government is not your babies daddy and it certainly isn't yours!